One of the main issues I hear people discussing when it comes to food
production is the natural vs. organic vs. conventional debate. Many
people don't know the difference between natural and organic, but they
do believe that both produce superior food when compared to conventional
growing methods. When discussing this issue, many state that that
natural/ organic food is simply "healthier".
I think what we often forget is that healthy food and "organic" or
"natural" aren't completely synonymous. For example, the latest trend
diet is Paleo, which basically means only eating things that a cave man
would eat. No processed foods, cheese wiz, donuts, cakes, Twinkies,
grains, bread noodles, rice, etc. While all of the foods might be
"natural", I have seen recipes for Paleo Pound Cake. I don't know about
you, but in what way is eating a pound cake a good part of a diet built
around erasing simple sugars from your pallet? By making a pound cake,
a person on the diet has inadvertently found a loophole to sabotage
their quest for better health. I also believe that eating grains in
general is something that is good for your health, but that is an
entirely different matter.
When arguing about food production, we need to remember to keep the
issues separate. Crash diets, natural, and organic are all part of the
American food culture. As farmers we can produce healthy food that may
not fit into each of those labels. At the same time, we want to
make sure that people who say they went to eating only "grass-fed"
meat because it is better for you than conventional beef is an opinion,
not a nutrition fact. A health fact would be eating that a bowl of
peaches is better for you than eating a box of Little Debbie snack
cakes. Our obesity problem doesn't stem from conventional farming,
but individual food choices made by individuals. Most people outside of
the agricultural community never really think about that distinction.
No comments:
Post a Comment